Service tax – Cestat Kolkata: Service provided to Hundred percent holding company abroad cannot be considered as an establishment of a distinct person and such services qualify as export of services – Appeal allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
21-Oct-2022 19:21:33
Order date – 20 October 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, M/s. Zaloni Technologies India Private Limited, a private limited company in India, is engaged in providing data management solutions to Zaloni Inc., a company incorporated in USA vide agreement dated June 15, 2007. The Appellant is exclusively engaged in the export of services under the head “Information Technology Software Services” in terms of Rule 6A of the Service Tax Rules, 1994.
- The appellant has applied for refund of the Cenvat Credit on input services in terms of Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 and the same was rejected on the ground that the services rendered by the Appellant do not meet the criteria under Clause (f) of Rule 6A(1) of the Service Tax Rule inasmuch as it is an overseas branch office of Zaloni Inc. and are merely establishments of distinct persons in accordance with Explanation 3(b) of Section 65B(44) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Issue –
- Whether service rendered by the appellant would qualify Export of services?
Order –
- The Tribunal relied on the decision of the Hon’ble Gujarat High Courtin the case of Linde Engineering India Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Union of India reported as 2020 (8) TMI 181 – Gujarat High Court wherein was held that a subsidiary and its parent company located in different taxable territories are totally distinct taxpayer (s) or different entities. Further, it is held that under Clause (44) of Section 65B has been considered and it has been held that service provided by a company in India to its Hundred percent holding company abroad cannot be considered as an establishment of a distinct person and therefore such services would be export of services.
- Further, the Appellant received the charges for their services in convertible foreign exchange. Therefore considering the fact that the Appellant and the service recipient are two distinct persons, the service provided by the Appellant to Zaloni Inc., USA clearly falls under the category of export of service.
- Hence the impugned orders are set aside. The Appeals are allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation