Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: As members of the Co-operative Housing Society are providing services to themselves, they are not liable to pay service tax at all, and once it has been held that they are not liable to pay service tax then penalty under section 70 ibid itself has no application for non-filing of returns – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
29-Nov-2022 13:24:18
Order date – 28 November 2022
Facts –
- The Appellant, Prabhadevi Himgiri Co-operative Housing Society Ltd, fails to file Service Tax Returns in the prescribed form ST-3 as required under Section 70 ibid r/w. Rule 7 electronically through ACES within the period prescribed therein.
- A show cause notice dated 19.02.2013 was issued for imposing penalty under Section 70 ibid r/w Rule 7C ibid for delayed filing of ST-3 Returns for the period from April, 2009 to March, 2011 and October, 2011 to March, 2012.
Issue –
- Whether the penalty under Section 70 can be imposed on appellant?
Order –
- The Tribunal finds that the Section 70 ibid provides that only the persons who are liable to pay service tax, have to file the return on time else they are liable to pay penalty.
- The appellants are not liable to pay service tax at all and once it has been held that they are not liable to pay service tax then section 70 ibid itself has no application. Although they have filed return belatedly for whatever reason but they were not obliged to do so. This act of theirs cannot put them in any adverse situation as they are not liable to pay any service tax.
- The Tribunal relied on the decision of Hon'ble Supreme Court, Hon'ble High Court and by this Tribunal as well and some of them are Matunga Gymkhana vs. CST, Mumbai; 2015 (38) STR 407 (Tri-Mum) and others held that in view of the principle of mutuality of interest as discussed hereinbefore and looking into the fact that the members of the Appellant are providing services to themselves, no Service Tax is leviable on the same.
- Hence observed that the appellant are not liable to pay any service tax therefore section 70 ibid has no application on the facts of this case and hence a fortiori there is no justification for imposing any penalty.
- Appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation