Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: Since the appellant is the creature of statute and is discharging a public function without any profit motive, cannot be made liable to tax not even under RCM for receiving legal consultancy services – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
22-Mar-2024 11:49:06
Order Date – 19 March 2024
Parties: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Vs Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax, Alwar
Facts –
- The Appellant, Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, was found to be receiving buses and taxies on hire from various parties and thereby were availing the rent-a-cab service, also receiving services provided by individual advocates or firm of advocates by the department.
- A show cause notice was issued on the ground that service tax for the period from 01.07.2012 to 31.03.2015 with respect to the both the above services was not paid by the appellant.
Issue –
- Whether the appellant is liable to discharge service tax for receiving buses and taxis on hire and legal consultancy services?
Order –
- The Tribunal observed that though in the present case the appellant is alleged to be the recipient of rent-a- cab service and is held liable under reverse charge mechanism (RCM) Notification No. 25/2012 dated 20.6.2012 exempts State Transport Undertaking from any tax liability. Hence it was held that appellant is not liable to service tax for receiving buses and taxis on hire.
- Since the appellant is the creature of statute and is discharging a public function without any profit motive and in view of Notification No. 25/2012, there arises no tax liability while rendering any service to Government authorities, the Tribunal held that the appellant cannot be made liable to tax not even under RCM for receiving legal consultancy services.
- There is no evidence found on record proving such intent / mensrea with the appellant to evade payment of service tax. The appellant have already been held not liable to pay the amount confirmed. Resultantly held that the department has wrongly invoked the extended period of limitation while issuing Show Cause Notice.
- Consequent thereto the appeal is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation