Login
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Law
Free
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
New
Articles
New
Login
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending Now
Delhi High Court - Limitation is determined by the dates of the substantive SCN and adjudication ord...
Allahabad High Court - Central CGST authority had initiated proceedings first, the subsequent State...
Madras High Court - Assessment order set aside for improper service of notices, as uploading notice...
Gujarat AAR - Rice Husk Board is a fibre board under HSN 4411, not a particle board; Attracts GST @1...
Top GST News and Real-Time Case Law Updates
Trending GST Circulars and Announcements
Latest E-Way Bill Case Laws
High Court Judgments on GST Issues
Expert Analysis on Indirect Tax News
Most Viewed GST Rulings This Week
Home
Top Stories
Top Stories
Delhi High Court - Limitation is determined by the dates of the substantive SCN and adjudication order, not the subsequent DRC-01 and DRC-07 dates [Order attached]
Allahabad High Court - Central CGST authority had initiated proceedings first, the subsequent State GST order being paralle proceedings is liable to be quashed [Order attached]
Madras High Court - Assessment order set aside for improper service of notices, as uploading notices on the GST portal without RPAD service violated natural justice [Order attached]
Gujarat AAR - Rice Husk Board is a fibre board under HSN 4411, not a particle board; Attracts GST @12% up to 21.09.2025 and at 5% from 22.09.2025 [Order attached]
Allahabad High Court - Filing a delayed GSTR-3B and paying the late fee leaves little room for a ₹50,000 general penalty under Section 125 - Court quashed the penalty Order [Order attached]
Delhi High Court - Issue of fake ITC - Court declined to entertain the writ petition against the GST demand, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate remedy [Order attached]
Patna High Court - Availability of an effective statutory remedy is a strong ground for High Court to decline interference in writ proceedings, unless exceptional circumstances are established [Order attached]
Madras High Court - SEZ unit is eligible to claim refund of unutilised ITC; such entitlement cannot be restricted merely because Rule 89 specifically refers to a supplier to an SEZ [Order attached]
Delhi High Court - An Advocate cannot claim client privilege as an absolute bar to a GST investigation where there is prima facie material suggesting his own involvement in the affairs under investigation [Order attached...
Delhi High Court - Parallel proceedings under Section 6(2)(b) are barred only when they concern the same liability or contravention; commonality of assessee, period or similar tax liability alone is insufficient. [Order...
57th GST Council recommendations: Reforms to simplify compliance, reduce penalties, speed up refunds, expand ITC benefits and ease registration procedures for taxpayers [Press release attached]
Delhi High Court - Penalty proceedings may be initiated against a deceased person’s legal representative; Three-year lapse does not bar proceedings under Section 93 [Order attached]
Next Page ›
News Updates
News Updates
57th GST Council recommendations: Reforms to simplify compli...
GST - Government has extended the last date for filing GSTAT...
GSTN is strengthening e-Way Bill ecosystem by making “Ship...
GSTAT has extended relaxed and simplified appeal filing proc...
View All
Subscribe Now