Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

Trending Now

Bombay High Court: GST dues of a deceased person cannot be recovered from legal heir without proper... Madras High Court: Demand u/s 76 of CGST cannot be invoked when tax collected is fully remitted to t... Bombay High Court: Refund rejection without following due process (deficiency memo + hearing) is voi... Madras High Court: Writ jurisdiction cannot be used to decide disputed classification and Section 74...

Top Stories

FTP: DGFT issued a Public Notice on extension of validity of Pre-Shipment Inspection Agency (PSIAs) from 03.12.2022 to 31.12.2022 [Notice attached]

GST – Chhattisgarh High Court: When Rule 120A provides for revising GST Tran-1 once, only because the portal has been opened as a one-time measure by itself cannot be construed that the Rule 120A cannot be made applicabl...

Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: Refund towards export of services cannot be denied on ground that there is no nexus between the input service used in export of service – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Customs – Cestat New Delhi: The goods being not notified goods under Section 123, it was onus on the Revenue to establish the smuggled nature of the goods, which the Revenue have miserably failed - Not a single evidence...

Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: Registration is not relevant in the absence of evidence of non-utilization of the capital goods in rendering of ‘output service’ and of eligibility to credit even if the address on invoices i...

GST – Madras High Court: ASMT 10 is mandatory before proceeding to issue GST DRC-01, failure to issue the same in respect of the discrepancies forming the subject matter in GST DRC-01 would vitiate the entire proceedings...

GST – AAR Maharashtra: Transfer of monetary proceedings by the applicant to Sweden will be liable to IGST under reverse charge mechanism - The entire support for service is provided by executed by applicant in India who...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Buyer’s premises can never be, by any law, can be called as the place of removal of excisable goods - Freight charges are not includible in the assessable value those being separately charged i...

Service tax – Cestat New Delhi: As the appellant carried out activity in the capacity of co-developer on principal to principal basis and not as agent, therefore, it cannot be alleged that appellant have provided Busines...

Customs – Cestat New Delhi: As the goods were not available for confiscation at the time of passing the order, hence confiscation order is bad and liable to set aside – However, appellant have resorted to unauthorized mo...

Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Part of the construction activity even if outside of SEZ, does not mean that service was received for other than authorised operations – Also, CHA services used by SEZ is allowed for refun...

Excise - Cestat Ahmedabad: Even though Appellant availed Cenvat credit but in compliance of Rule 6(3), they reversed the credit which will amount to non-availment of credit, hence there is no violation of any condition –...

‹ Previous Page Next Page ›

News Updates

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442