Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

Trending Now

AAR Gujarat: Since Notification referred only to “fuel”, concessional rate cannot be extended to ele... Bombay High Court: Second GST refund application cannot be rejected merely because a prior applicati... Gujarat High Court: Section 16(2)(c) is constitutionally valid, ITC is denied if the supplier fails... Calcutta High Court: False declaration in e-way bill and improper documentation can attract penalty...

Top Stories

Excise – Cestat Chennai: Goods cleared under Notification No.30/2004 without payment of duty is optional payment without duty and it cannot be said that these fall within the definition of ‘exempted goods’ – Hence, Cenva...

GST – Patna High Court: Issue of availing ITC after the due date – Held that the Order passed by Revenue is in violation of principal of natural justice as Order was passed ex-parte and also it does not assign sufficient...

GST – Madras High Court: Pursuant to furnishing of Bank Guarantee for penalty of 200% in terms of Section 129(1)(a), Revenue is directed to accept it and detained consignment is required to be released within 48 hours.

GST – Rajasthan High Court: Issue of misclassification – Held that brand New Aluminium sections cannot be placed equivalence with Aluminium scrap – Revenue was perfectly justified in detaining the Petitioner’s vehicle an...

Service tax – Cestat Kolkata: Considering the initial date of filing rebate claims by the Appellant, the same are not barred by limitation - Technical deviations or procedural lapses are to be condoned, if there is suffi...

Customs - Cestat Mumbai: Case cannot be remanded back by Commissioner (A) limited to a specific purpose, instead can be remanded back to examine all the issues involved in appeal and decide the matter after giving opport...

Excise - Cestat Kolkata: As the entire demand along with interest was paid by the Appellant before issuance of show-cause notice and there is no evidence of having committed fraud, collusion or suppression of facts, henc...

GST – Punjab and Haryana High Court: Timelines to reply show cause notice as well as to dispose refund application within 60 days, both are covered under extended timelines granted during Covid: Appeal allowed [Order Att...

Service Tax – Cestat Chandigarh: Performing services on Client’s systems and that too as a backend process without requirement of any interaction with Customers of the Client cannot be classified as ‘Intermediary Service...

Excise – Allahabad High Court : Issue of remission of duty on destroyed goods – Held that the loss was within the tolerable limit of 2%, also Brown Sugar not being marketable goods, duty is not payable: Petition allowed....

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Credit is admissible on Input and Input service used in the manufacture of job work goods; Common Cenvat Credit attributed to Trading of Goods on High Seas Basis were already reversed by Appell...

Service tax – Cestat Mumbai: It is settled position that refund cannot be denied as there were no proceedings for denial of Cenvat Credit in terms of Rule 14; No deduction from total Cenvat Credit taken is allowed on any...

‹ Previous Page Next Page ›

News Updates

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442