Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending

GST - Tripura High Court: A bona fide purchaser cannot be denied ITC merely because the seller faile... GST - Madras High Court: W.e.f 01.04.2024, Sections 73 and 74 were omitted, and is goverbed by Secti... GST - Supreme Court over rules Gujarat High Court judgement holding once tax burden has been passed,... GST - Madras High Court: Retrospective insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) restores eligibility fo...

Top Stories

Service Tax – Cestat Kolkata: Issue of classification – Commissioner himself taking note of the fact that the construction service is inclusive of supply of goods has excluded the value of goods for raising demand of ser...

Service tax – Calcutta High Court: Technical glitch while making payment of tax dues vide Form SVLDR-3 – The Writ Court must take up the matter as the allegation of technical glitches made by the appellant was not wrong...

GST – Allahabad High Court: Furnishing of incorrect pin code and leading to generation of e-way for another state is a bonafide mistake – In absence of any allegation of ill-intent on part of the assessee, the imposition...

Excise – Bombay High Court: Permission granted to Petitioner to revise Form TRAN-1, based on revised ER-1 returns, pursuant to the recent Supreme Court Order

Service Tax – Cestat Kolkata: Rebate claim cannot be rejection on a flimsy ground that Appellant is not registered with “Export Promotion council” - Appeal allowed with consequential benefits [Order attached]

Customs – Bombay High Court: Provisions which were not in existence on the date of import, cannot be later applied retrospectively for demand of duty [Order attached]

Service Tax – Cestat New Delhi: No Service tax liability under RCM when premises is taken on rent from Director for residential purpose - Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Director is not liable to Penalty as the main Noticee has already settled the dispute under SVLDR Scheme: Appeal allowed. [Order Attached]

Customs – Bombay High Court: Sustaining a Show Cause Notice for over a period of 25 years is a violation of Principle of Natural Justice – Impugned Show cause notice was quashed and directed revenue to refund the causele...

Service tax – Cestat Kolkata: As per Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rule, 1982, the matter has been adjourned more than three times, therefore it shows that the appellants are not interested in pursuing their appeal before...

Service Tax – Cestat Allahabad: As adjudicating authority had not formed an opinion that there is deliberate suppression with an intention to evade payment of service tax, demand beyond the normal period of limitation is...

FTP – Bombay High Court: IEC number is not mandatory to claim of SEIS – Imposing such additional restriction is a violation of principle legislation - Petition allowed. [Order attached]

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442