Login
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Law
Free
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
New
Articles
New
Login
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending Now
AAR Gujarat: Since Notification referred only to “fuel”, concessional rate cannot be extended to ele...
Bombay High Court: Second GST refund application cannot be rejected merely because a prior applicati...
Gujarat High Court: Section 16(2)(c) is constitutionally valid, ITC is denied if the supplier fails...
Calcutta High Court: False declaration in e-way bill and improper documentation can attract penalty...
Top GST News and Real-Time Case Law Updates
Trending GST Circulars and Announcements
Latest E-Way Bill Case Laws
High Court Judgments on GST Issues
Expert Analysis on Indirect Tax News
Most Viewed GST Rulings This Week
Home
Top Stories
Top Stories
Service Tax – CESTAT Ahmedabad: Fabrication of structures fall within the definition of taxable service of “Commercial or Industrial Construction Service” and would not fall within the definition of “Erection, Commission...
DGFT has issued Policy Circular No. 43/2015-20 dated 27 July 2022 regarding relaxation in the provision of submission of ‘Bill of Export’ as an evidence of export obligation discharge for supplies made to the Special Eco...
GST – Madras High Court: Without issuance of show cause notice under section 74(1), assessment order cannot be finalized merely vide Form DRC-01A – Impugned Order as well as recovery notice, issued to the Branch Manager,...
GST – AAR Rajasthan: Supply of manpower service for running and maintenance of canteen is Temporary staffing service and attracts @ 18% GST.
Customs – Cestat Mumbai: Evidence not tested by the cross-examination has no probative value and there should be an opportunity provided to the opposite parties to cross examination the witnesses: Matter remanded back an...
Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Appellant is now provided an opportunity to produce the documents to adjudicating authorities to reconsider the case; Simultaneous penalties u/s 76 and 78 cannot be imposed.
Customs – Cestat Kolkata: Fe content cannot be determined merely on dry wet basis; Not following the order of High Court or Apex Court would amount to mistake/error which is rectifiable u/s 154 - Directed the lower autho...
Customs – High Court Bombay: Since Petitioner had had not paid 100% duty and had already availed of concession as per Notification 27/02, he is not entitled to any drawback: Appeal dismissed.
GST – AAR Rajasthan: The value of diesel filled free of cost by the service recipient is not includible in the value of the GTA service.
Service tax – Cestat New Delhi: Composite works contract services involving supply of goods/deemed supply of goods and rendering services is classifiable as works contract services only.
Service tax – Bombay High Court: Petitioner ought to have been given a personal hearing before rejecting declaration filed under SVLDR, not providing so is against the principles of natural justice: Impugned Order is qua...
Customs – Cestat Chennai: The appellant is allowed to produce documents to substantiate their refund claim - Appeal allowed by way of remanding back.
‹ Previous Page
Next Page ›
News Updates
News Updates
GST News: Due to GST Portal Glitch, Govt Likely to Extend Ma...
GST News - Advisory issued regarding difficulty in filing ap...
GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered ...
GSTN has launched Form GST REG-32 on the portal to enable el...
View All
Subscribe Now