Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending

GST - Tripura High Court: A bona fide purchaser cannot be denied ITC merely because the seller faile... GST - Madras High Court: W.e.f 01.04.2024, Sections 73 and 74 were omitted, and is goverbed by Secti... GST - Supreme Court over rules Gujarat High Court judgement holding once tax burden has been passed,... GST - Madras High Court: Retrospective insertion of Sections 16(5) and 16(6) restores eligibility fo...

Top Stories

Service Tax – Cestat Hyderabad: The intent to suppress duty must be established to invoke penalty under extended period of limitation - Respondent was to gain nothing by evading and as respondent itself would pay with on...

Customs – Cestat Ahmadabad: Lower authorities are bound to follow the directions given by Tribunal; If depreciation is considered upto the date of payment then duty comes to Nil: Appeal allowed with consequential relief...

GST – AAR Uttarakhand: Exemption is available on works service provided to Government only if the consideration received is in the form of grants and has been utilized for the intended purpose only – The applicant has sa...

Central Excise – Appeal filed by the revenue under Section 35 H (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - The decision will not render any assistance to the case of the revenue

Custom – Cestat Mumbai: There can be no golden formula for imposition of fine and pre-deposit to release the seized goods – Provisional release of seized goods allowed by executing bank guarantee.

Service Tax – Cestat Mumbai: Refund of pre-deposit allowed even if expensed off in books of accounts – Appeal allowed

Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Vodafone is not required to reverse the Cenvat credit on capital goods after demerger as there is no physical removal of capital goods from its premises – Impugned Order is set aside.

Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Refund of EC, SHEC and KKC is allowed as availment of Cenvat Credit is a vested right - appeal allowed with consequential reliefs.

Service Tax – Cestat Chennai: Time limit for consideration of refund claim under Rule 5 of the CCR is the end of the quarter in which FIRC is received, in cases where the refund claims are filed on a quarterly basis, and...

Service Tax – Cestat Ahmedabad: Refund is eligible to SEZ unit for receiving marketing services from DTA unit, even when DTA is not a separate legal entity; Merely for the reason that the service is not included in the a...

Service Tax – Cestat Ahmadabad: Penalty under extended period of limitation is not invokable as SCN does not mention that suppression was with an intention to evade payment of service tax – Appeal allowed.

GST- Bombay High Court: Refund of unutilized ITC is allowed on export of services as incidence of tax is not passed on to recipient – Writ petition allowed.

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442