Login
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Law
Free
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
New
Login
X
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending Now
Karnataka High Court: GST authorities can use material collected by other commissionerates, especial...
Gujarat High Court : ITC can be transferred across states after amalgamation; GST portal restriction...
Orissa High Court: Limitation for filing an appeal begins from the date of communication of order, n...
Karnataka High Court: Concessional benefits for exports not available when goods sent to third party...
Home
Custom
Customs Duty Case Laws, Refund Updates & SEZ Rulings
Duty Refund & Exemption Case Summaries
SEZ Export Policies and Tribunal Rulings
Import/Export Procedure Updates
High Court Judgments on Customs Disputes
Custom
Customs: Cestat Chennai: Assessment order including self-assessment needs to be challenged to become eligible for refund, as the appellants have not challenged the order of assessment they are not eligible for refund – A...
Customs – Cestat Chennai: Issue of re-export of goods due to wrong consignments loaded from supplier’s factory – Held that as the goods are freely importable and not prohibited goods, refusing the request to re-export th...
Customs – Cestat Chennai: Refund of SAD cannot be rejected merely on the ground that the commercial invoice does not consist of endorsement that “credit of duty is not admissible” – Refund allowed [Order attached]
Customs – CBIC has issued circular amending Notification No. 57/2017- Customs dated 30.06.3017 regarding telecommunication products or equipment [Circular attached]
Customs – Cestat Chennai: A trader-importer, who paid SAD on the imported goods and who discharged VAT/ST liability on subsequent sale, who is entitled to the benefit of SAD exemption, notwithstanding the fact that he ma...
Customs – Cestat Hyderabad: I Stat System along with cartridges being a blood analyser can be classifiable under CTH 9027 – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Custom – Cestat New Delhi: In the absence of specific provision of Section 27 being made applicable in the notification, the time-limit of filing refund application within one year would not be automatically applicable t...
Customs – Cestat Ahmedabad: Value enhancement of imported goods as per NIDB data cannot be accepted in the absence of independent evidence, it is a settled law in various judgments that the benefit of exemption notificat...
Customs – Madras High Court: Impugned Order passed after more than 10 years of issue of SCN and personal hearing, is not tenable; Even though no limitation is prescribed in the Act the statutory authority must exercise j...
Custom – Cestat Chennai: Once a Customs Broker verifies the IEC, GST details etc. of an exporter, he is not further expected to enter into the role of an investigator and verify whether the documents issued by government...
Customs – Cestat New Delhi: SCN does not rely on anything but an email said to be sent by the DGARM indicating a list of suspicious exporters, it cannot be a substitute for evidence – There is no evidence to support the...
Customs – New Delhi High Court: Mere description or misdescription in the shipping bill for whatever compelling reasons, does not change the actual factum as to who actually exported the goods - FTWZ logistics Company is...
CUSTOMS – Cestat Mumbai – Issue of recovery of drawback due to non-receipt of foreign inward remittance – Held that no finding has been recorded by the original authority as to why they had imposed penalty under Section...
Customs – Gujarat High Court: Without passing any order of seizure under Section 110, when there was a detention and there was a specific denial for shifting the goods to the public warehouse in order to save the demurra...
Custom – Cestat Ahmedabad – Issue of export of inferior quality of goods – Held that the charge of clandestine removal of goods, cannot be established on assumptions and presumptions, such a charge has to be based on con...
Customs – Gujarat High Court: As there is no time limit provided to issue SCN, the reasonable period to issue SCN cannot be more than 3 Years of payment of duty drawback, in view of the same the instant SCN issued after...
Custom – Cestat New Delhi: The imputations in the letter were later on found to be true but after the search by Department, at the time the SCN was issued, the allegation was merely based on suspicion and hence the SCN i...
Custom – Cestat Chennai: Appellant being 100% EOUs are not liable to pay interest on the duty paid on the stock of raw material warehoused beyond the period of three years – In absence of any limitation period for demand...
Customs – New Delhi High Court: Petitioner’s refund claim request was in continuation of the proceedings relating to the earlier application for refund and is not to be treated as fresh refund application, hence refund c...
Customs – Delhi High Court: As the proceedings for revocation of the petitioner’s Custom broker license were commenced beyond the period of ninety days from the date of the Offence Report, the impugned order revoking the...
‹ Previous Page
Short Reels
Linkedin (English)
Instagram (Hindi)
News Updates
GST Advisory: Pre-deposit paid via DRC-03 is not considered ...
GSTN has launched Form GST REG-32 on the portal to enable el...
GSTN issued FAQs to clarify significant reporting and auto-p...
GSTN issued advisory to intimate Form GSTR-9/9C for FY 2024-...
View All
Subscribe Now