TAX REAL TIME
QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS
Register
Sign in |
X
MENU
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Laws
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending
GST – Allahabad High Court holds taxable event of works contract is its execution, which is in pre-G...
GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation of goods and vehicle is illegal merely for violation of Sec...
GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Rule 86A(3) provides restriction to block credit ledger automatic...
GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation under Section 130 invalid in case of excess stock found; Pr...
Home
Excise / VAT / CST
Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws and Tribunal Judgments
Excise Duty Refund & Interest Appeals
CENVAT Credit Disputes – Case Summaries
Show Cause Notices Under Central Excise
VAT Assessment & Penalty Judgments
Latest CST Rulings from Tribunals
Excise / VAT / CST
Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Director is not liable to Penalty as the main Noticee has already settled the dispute under SVLDR Scheme: Appeal allowed. [Order Attached]
Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Without any corroborative evidence of clandestine removal, Revenue’s contention is not maintainable – Statement recorded during investigations would stand vitiated in law, in absence of the state...
Excise – CESTAT New Delhi – Without corroboration of the allegation of Revenue with the records of the appellant, no demand can be raised – Appeal allowed [Order attached]
Excise – CESTAT Kolkata: Services received for modernization/ renovation plan of factory or office are eligible for credit to the recipient - Impugned order is set aside. [Order Attached]
Excise - The Central Government has issued Notification No.19/2022 dated 19 July 2022 wherein it has exempted excisable goods, namely- Petrol, Diesel and Aviation Turbine Fuel from Special Additional Excise Duty and roa...
Excise – CESTAT Chennai: When a statutory notice is issued, it is incumbent upon the appellant to at least offer an explanation to clear the doubts pointed out, in its absence there is no reason to interfere with the wel...
Excise – CESTAT Mumbai: ‘Catch covers’ are nothing but ‘packing material’ and cannot be included in the aggregate value of clearance in computing the benefit of SSI exemption.
Central Excise – Karnataka High Court: Trading activities of the Respondent was mentioned on the balance sheet, thus, it is not the case that Revenue was not known to this fact hence there is no suppression of facts - Ex...
Excise – Bombay High Court: Excise duty paid can be claimed as drawback wherein the products are locally procured and are used in manufacture for export goods - Impugned order is quashed and set aside.
Excise – Cestat New Delhi: The appellant is entitled to the Cenvat credit for the service tax paid on rent-a-cab services; the “place of removal” continues to be the seller’s premises whether it be the factory gate or an...
Excise – Bombay High Court: Not having sufficient details for accusation Director of a company liable for penalty, is contrary to the principle of vicarious liability.
Excise – Cestat Chennai: Assessee is incumbent to atleast offer an explanation to clear the doubts, in case a notice is issued – In absence of explanation, the fact remains same that assessee has wrongfully availed CENVA...
‹ Previous Page
News Updates
Advisory – New ‘Import of Goods’ Section added in Invo...
CBIC – Circular issued on assignment and jurisdiction of o...
GSTN issued FAQs to clarify significant reporting and auto-p...
GSTN issued advisory to intimate Form GSTR-9/9C for FY 2024-...
View All
Subscribe Now
Issue under GST
×
Email
Mobile No.
Message