TAX REAL TIME
QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS
Register
Sign in |
X
MENU
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Laws
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending
GST – Allahabad High Court holds taxable event of works contract is its execution, which is in pre-G...
GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation of goods and vehicle is illegal merely for violation of Sec...
GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Rule 86A(3) provides restriction to block credit ledger automatic...
GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation under Section 130 invalid in case of excess stock found; Pr...
Home
Excise / VAT / CST
Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws and Tribunal Judgments
Excise Duty Refund & Interest Appeals
CENVAT Credit Disputes – Case Summaries
Show Cause Notices Under Central Excise
VAT Assessment & Penalty Judgments
Latest CST Rulings from Tribunals
Excise / VAT / CST
Central Excise – Cestat Hyderabad: As the reason of rejection of refund recorded by the Original Authority as well as the Commissioner (Appeals) is that proper documents were not submitted, so Appellant given an opportun...
Central Excise – Calcutta High Court: Electricity generated from waste Gas is neither excisable goods nor exempted goods for the purpose of reversal of credit under Rule 6 – Revenue appeal dismissed.
Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Cenvat Credit of tax paid on the transportation of the final product from the place of removal upto the first point, whether it is depot or the customer, has to be allowed.
Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Refund claim of excess duty paid is allowed as there is retrospective price variation in terms of the contract- Appeal allowed with consequential relief.
Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Rejection of appeal without providing detailed item-wise findings is not maintainable – Remanded back to the Commissioner.
Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Imposition of Penalty without issue of SCN is violation of principle of natural justice - Appeal allowed setting aside the penalty.
Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Buyer Premise cannot be considered as Place of Removal to levy excise duty on freight – Impugned Order set aside.
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: freight was not separately charged from the customers the same was borne by the appellant therefore, it is the part and parcel of the invoice value and the excise duty was charged on the said...
Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: No limitation u/s 11B is not applicable for refund of PLA balance as it is not deposited as a duty: Appeal allowed.
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Burden to prove fraudulently availed Cenvat credit without receipt of goods lies on Revenue by producing sufficient evidence: Impugned Order demanding Cenvat credit is set aside.
Excise Duty - Cestat Chennai: The scrap is generated after the process of manufacture and the same is not includible in the assessable value of the goods cleared by the job worker to the principal manufacturer – Impugned...
Central Excise – Appeal filed by the revenue under Section 35 H (1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 - The decision will not render any assistance to the case of the revenue
‹ Previous Page
News Updates
Advisory – New ‘Import of Goods’ Section added in Invo...
CBIC – Circular issued on assignment and jurisdiction of o...
GSTN issued FAQs to clarify significant reporting and auto-p...
GSTN issued advisory to intimate Form GSTR-9/9C for FY 2024-...
View All
Subscribe Now
Issue under GST
×
Email
Mobile No.
Message