TAX REAL TIME
QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS
Register
Sign in |
X
MENU
Home
GST
News Updates
GST Laws
GST ISSUES
GST Rates
Acts
Rules
Forms
Notifications
Circulars
Instructions / Guidelines
Orders
Finance Act (GST)
Trending
GST – Allahabad High Court holds taxable event of works contract is its execution, which is in pre-G...
GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation of goods and vehicle is illegal merely for violation of Sec...
GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Rule 86A(3) provides restriction to block credit ledger automatic...
GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation under Section 130 invalid in case of excess stock found; Pr...
Home
Excise / VAT / CST
Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws and Tribunal Judgments
Excise Duty Refund & Interest Appeals
CENVAT Credit Disputes – Case Summaries
Show Cause Notices Under Central Excise
VAT Assessment & Penalty Judgments
Latest CST Rulings from Tribunals
Excise / VAT / CST
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Penalty is not imposable as Cenvat credit was reversed with interest without utilization.
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Cenvat Credit fraudulent availed merely on the strength of invoices without physical receipts of the goods shall attract penalty under Rule 26 of Central Excise Rule 2002.
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Availment of Cenvat credit on the strength of photocopies of invoices is just a procedural lapse and cannot be made the basis to disallow the credit – Order denying credit is set aside.
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Goods were supplied along with the invoices, there is no fraudulent passing of CENVAT Credit – Penalty set aside.
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmadabad: Warehoused raw materials even though were not used in manufacture by 100% EOU but were intended to be used for manufacturing purposes, hence interest payable only after expiry of 3 year...
Central Excise – Cestat New Delhi: No Cenvat reversal required on selling of electricity generated out of waste – Impugned Order set aside.
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad- As refund of deposit was sanctioned within three months from the date of application - Not entitled for interest.
Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: As per the statutory mandate of Section 11BB of the Act the department is under legal obligation to sanction the refund claim along with interest after the expiry of 3 months from the date of f...
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad – Personal penalty of 5 Lacs cannot be imposed on the Chairman and MD of the company who is not looking after the accountal of the goods manufactured – only token penalty can be levied –...
Central Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Revenue cannot appropriate demand towards penalty and interest from the sanctioned rebate claim when the demand case is pending before the tribunal – Impugned Order is liable to set asi...
Central Excise –Cestat New Delhi-Adjustment cannot be exercised for demand of tax/interest/penalty from the refundable amount.
‹ Previous Page
News Updates
Advisory – New ‘Import of Goods’ Section added in Invo...
CBIC – Circular issued on assignment and jurisdiction of o...
GSTN issued FAQs to clarify significant reporting and auto-p...
GSTN issued advisory to intimate Form GSTR-9/9C for FY 2024-...
View All
Subscribe Now
Issue under GST
×
Email
Mobile No.
Message