Customs – High Court Bombay: Since Petitioner had had not paid 100% duty and had already availed of concession as per Notification 27/02, he is not entitled to any drawback: Appeal dismissed.

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
30-Jul-2022 06:13:33
Order date – 07 July 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Expotec International Ltd., is a public limited company engaged in the import and export of goods and services and is a recognized export house.
- At the time of importation of capital goods, petitioner had paid customs duty after availing benefit of Notification No.27/02-Cus dated 1st March 2002.
- Upon re-exporting these goods, petitioner claimed drawback under Section 74(2) of the Customs Act 1962 read with Notification No.19/1965 dated 6th February 1965. The petitioner were granted the drawback of Rs.9,04,190/- of customs duty paid on the capital goods re-exported.
- Thereafter, Petitioner received demand notices from respondent dated 11 July 2005, proposing to recover the drawback granted to petitioner.
Issue –
- Whether petitioner was entitled to any drawback on the customs duty that they had paid, under Section 74 of the said Act read with Notification 27/02 read with Notification 19/1965 read with Notification No.27/2008-Cus dated 1st March 2008?
Order –
- The Court observed that a drawback in relation to any goods exported out of India means the refund of duty paid on importation of such goods in terms of Section 74 of the said Act. Under Section 74, therefore, the expression “any duty that has been paid on importation” would mean 100% of the duty that was payable.
- They also observed that the concession was given to the importer so they do not have to pay the entire 100% and then claim a drawback of 85% or 70%. Hence, those who fall under Notification 27/02 are not entitled to any drawback under Section 74.
- Petitioner would have been entitled to a drawback of either 85% or 70% depending on when the goods were re-exported, if they had paid 100% customs duty and not filed declarations under Notification 27/02.
- Since petitioner had not paid 100% duty availing of Notification 27/02 and had already availed of concession as per Notification 27/02, petitioner is not entitled to any drawback and hence the appeal has been dismissed with costs in the sum of Rs.1 lakh.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation