GST – Allahabad High Court: Goods were found to be different than mentioned in e-way bill - Held that since the documents have already been produced before passing of the detention as well as seizure order, further proceedings are not justifiable – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
09-Nov-2023 22:33:10
Order Date – 06 November 2023
Parties: M/S Galaxy Enterprises Vs State Of U.P. And 2 Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S Galaxy Enterprises engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of laminated papers. They Transported goods from Muzaffarnagar to Rajasthan along with tax invoices, E-way Bills and GR.
- Goods were intercepted during the transit and after physical verification Form GST MOV-04 was issued on the ground that the goods were found to be different than mentioned in accompanying documents. Thereafter a show cause notice was issued in Form GST MOV-07 on 27.1.2022.
- Being not satisfied with the reply fied by the petitioner, penalty was imposed by order dated 27.1.2022.
Issue –
- Whether imposition of penalty is valid if the documents have already been produced before passing of the detention or seizure order?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the authorities below has not accepted the documents on the ground that same were produced after the movement of goods. But lost the site of the fact that the discrepancies were cured before the detention or seizure order could be passed.
- Once the documents were produced before passing of the detention / seizure order, the authorities ought not to have proceeded further as held by the Division Bench judgement of this Court in the case of M/S Axpress Logistics India Pvt. Ltd and M/s Bhumika Enterprises.
- Hence it was held that the impugned order is not justified as the documents have already been produced before passing of the detention as well as seizure order. The writ petition is allowed and remanded back to the first appellate authority to pass afresh order.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation