GST – Allahabad High Court: Once Revisionary authority entered into merits of the matter under Section 108, he could not have observed that revision was not maintainable on the ground that there was a provision of appeal - Writ Petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
02-Mar-2025 12:07:28
Order Date – 22 January 2025
Parties: M/S Buddha Resorts Private Limited Thru. Director Shri. Anil Tekriwal Lko. Vs Chief Commissioner Of Goods And Services Tax (Gst) Lko. Zone And Another
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S Buddha Resorts Private Limited, has challenged revisional order passed by the Revisional Authority under Section 108 of U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.
- It wax contented that the revision of the petitioner has been dismissed firstly on merits and then as not maintainable. The submission is that the revision was maintainable in view of the language used in Section 108 of the CGST Act, 2017.
Issue –
- Whether the Revisional order is maintainable?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that if the revision was not maintainable on the ground that there was a provision of appeal, then, the Revisional Authority should not have discussed any other aspect of the matter, however, if he entered into merits of the matter in the sense as to whether the parameters and prerequisites for exercise of revisional powers under Section 108 were existing or not, then, he could not have observed that the writ petition is not maintainable. The order is not clear.
- The writ petition Is accordingly allowed. The revision shall stands restored to its original number before the Revisional Authority for a consideration afresh in accordance with law.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation