GST – Karnataka High Court: Order clubbed together of multiple financial years 2019-20 to 2023-24 in a single demand is impermissible as specific action must be completed within the relevant year – Writ Petition allowed [Order attached]


Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
02-Mar-2025 12:12:24
Order Date – 22 January 2025
Parties: Gopi Chand Vs Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit)
Facts –
- The petitioner, Gopi Chand, operating as Kunal Constructions, received an order demanding payment of dues under Section 73 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (KGST Act).
- The petitioner argued that this order clubbed together multiple financial years (2019-20 to 2023-24) in a single demand. They asserted that GST regulations require separate show-cause notices and orders for each individual financial year.
Issue –
- Whether single order under Section 73 of the KGST Act combine demands for multiple distinct financial years?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that by clubbing more than one financial year, the petitioner was issued with show-cause notice and the order is passed under Section 73 of 2017 Act which is impermissible.
- In terms of Section 73 of KGST Act, specific action must be completed within the relevant year since the limitation is prescribed. Hence, clubbing multiple assessment years is impermissible.
- The writ petition is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
- Whether assignment by sale/ transfer of leasehold rights of immovable property is leviable to GST ?
- GST
- Service Tax
- Personal hearing
- Custom
- Excise / VAT / CST
- DGFT / SEZ
- News Updates
- Issue wise cases
- Whether 'purchase price' or 'purchase cost' should be considered for GST payment on margin money for second-hand goods ?
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.

Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation