GST – Allahabad High Court: As per Section 67(1) it is only after reasons are provided to the Joint Commissioner that he can authorize in writing any search and seizure to be carried out, which is missing in this case and accordingly, the entire authorization is vitiated and liable to be quashed – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
18-Dec-2023 23:10:35
Order Date – 13 December 2023
Parties: M/S. Gaurav Saurav Traders And Contractors Vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/S. Gaurav Saurav Traders And Contractors, contended that the mandatory provision with regard to Section 67 (1) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 has not been complied with by the Joint Commissioner while granting the authorization for search and seizure.
Issue –
- Whether the search procedures duly authorised?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the authorization for search under the Form GST INS -01 was issued on 31.08.2022. However, the reasons for carrying out the search was provided to the Joint Commissioner subsequently which he has signed on September 1, 2022.
- Upon a careful perusal of the Section 67(1) it is clear that it is only after reasons are provided to the Joint Commissioner that he can authorize in writing any search and seizure to be carried out. In the present case, the said procedure had not been followed, and accordingly, the entire authorization is vitiated and liable to be quashed.
- Hence it was held that the entire search and seizure that has been carried out is based on an illegal authorization and is accordingly quashed and set aside. The Authorities are directed to release all goods and documents that they may have detained or confiscated within a period of 15 days from date.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation