GST – Allahabad High Court: Voluntarily cancellation and subsequent issue of notice u/s 74 without proper intimation and opportunity of hearing is vitiated and bad in law and violation of the principles of natural justice – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
16-Jan-2024 11:51:09
Order Date – 08 January 2024
Parties: M/s Eastern Machin Bricks And Tiles Industries Vs State of UP and Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner M/s Eastern Machine Bricks And Tiles Industries, had cancelled its registration voluntarily on September 18, 2019, whereas the notice under Section 74 of the Act was given to it only by way of uploading the same on the web portal in the year 2021 or in late December 2020 as the date fixed for hearing was January 12, 2021.
- It was further submitted that the department has not provided with the copy of Special Investigation Branch report and did not grant a second opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Issue –
- Whether there is violation of the principles of natural justice?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that it is trite law that principles of audi alteram partem are required to be followed by the authority and giving a go by to the same results in violation of the principles of natural justice. One may examine the development of the law in relation to natural justice.
- In the present case, when the petitioner had cancelled its registration in the year 2019, a proper notice was required to be issued to it under Section 74 of the Act at its address. However, the authorities simply uploaded the Section 74 show cause notice on the web portal inspite of knowing that the petitioner had already cancelled its registration prior to the date of issuance of the show cause notice. This action clearly prevented the petitioner from appearing in the hearing in the original proceeding under Section 74 of the Act that was accordingly passed ex parte.
- Moreover, it was incumbent upon the authorities to provide the copies of materials being relied upon by them (SIB report, in this case) to the petitioner/assessee so as to enable him to deal with the same. Hence, any action that proceeds without proper intimation and service of the show cause notice to the petitioner is vitiated and bad in law, and is, accordingly quashed and set aside, the writ petition is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation