GST – Madhya Pradesh High Court: Whether or not the petitioners have specifically asked for personal hearing, it was obligatory and mandatory on the part of respondents to provide the petitioners opportunity of personal hearing – Writ petition disposed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
19-Dec-2023 10:15:11
Order Date – 05 December 2023
Parties: M/s Technosys Security System Private Limited Vs Commissioner, Commercial Tax and Deputy Commissioner, State Tax
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Technosys Security System Private Limited, was issued with a show cause notice determining an amount as tax to be payable. The petitioner filed a reply to the show cause notice and final order was passed without providing opportunity of hearing.
- It was submitted by the respondent that the petitioner was required to opt for ‘personal hearing’ which was admittedly not opted and in that event, no fault can be found in the action of the respondents.
Issue –
- Whether the opportunity of hearing is mandatory?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that in the instant case whether or not the petitioners have specifically asked for personal hearing, fact remains that the adverse decision was contemplated against the petitioners.
- It was obligatory and mandatory on the part of respondents to provide the petitioners opportunity of personal hearing. Admittedly, no opportunity of personal hearing has been provided in both the matters. Resultantly, the decision making process adopted by the respondents is vitiated and runs contrary to the principles of natural justice and statutory requirement of sub-section 4 of Section 75 of GST Act.
- Hence the impugned proceedings after the stage of reply of show cause notices, in both the cases are set-aside and the writ petitions disposed of.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation