Service tax – Bombay High Court: Petitioner ought to have been given a personal hearing before rejecting declaration filed under SVLDR, not providing so is against the principles of natural justice: Impugned Order is quashed.
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
29-Jul-2022 08:19:39
Order Date – 18 July 2022
Facts –
- The Petitioner, Rakesh Industrial Stitching, filed a writ petition against rejection of the declaration filed by petitioner under the ‘Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme Rules, 2019’.
- The Petitioner contended that the rejection has been made by passing a very cryptic order without spelling out the reason. After perusal of the Form SVLDRS-1 issued by respondent No.2 in the remarks it only states “investigation already initiated by department”.
- Aggrieved the petitioner filed a writ petition.
Issue –
- Whether the order passed by the revenue is in violation of principles of natural justice?
Order –
- The Court observed that Petitioner ought to have been given a personal hearing before his declaration was rejected.
- The court relied on an identical case Magnum Management & Services Pvt. Ltd. V. Union of India & Ors. in which it was held that since the impugned rejection of the declaration of the petitioner is in violation of the principles of natural justice which has impacted the decision making process thus rendering the decision invalid.
- Therefore the court set aside the order and directed respondents to reconsider petitioner’s declaration and pass order as it deemed fit but after offering an opportunity of a personal hearing to petitioner.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation