Service Tax – Cestat Kolkata: Revenue should undertake the reconciliation of the revenue realized contract wise, with the Service tax return, and accordingly determine the demand amount – Matter Remanded back.
.jpg)
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
07-Aug-2022 02:57:12
Order date – 28 July 2022
Facts
- The appellant, SPML Infra Limited, is providing services under the taxable category of Maintenance and Repair Services, Erection, Commissioning or Installation Services, Construction of Residential Complex Services, Work Contract Services etc.
- During the audit, it was observed that appellants had not paid the service tax on unbilled revenue, over availed CENVAT Credit availed as compared from trial balance.
- A show cause notice dated 29.01.2015 was issued to the appellant.
- Aggrieved, the appellant has appealed before the Tribunal.
Issue
- Whether the appellant is liable to pay service tax on the unbilled revenue amount and over availment of Cenvat credit?
Order
- The Tribunal observed that the revenue should have undertaken the exercise of reconciliation of the revenue realized against each of the projects with the entries made in the ST-3 return and should arrive at any conclusion in respect of the demand for service tax. In case the revenue realized is not reflected in the service tax returns filed over the period of time, then only revenue demand can be sustained otherwise the demand needs to be set aside.
- Further, the entries recorded in the book of accounts are toward the expected revenue and expense recognition and not on the basis of the actual amounts realized against the contracts undertaken by the appellant. The Service tax is paid on the basis of the revenue realized towards the provision of the taxable services and not on the basis of the revenue recognition.
- The authorities held that the Revenue should reconcile the revenue realized contract wise, with the service tax return, and if there all the revenues realized either as advance or on the completion of the contract can be reconciled with the ST-3 returns then demands need to be set aside or restricted to the unexplained amounts realized and not reflected in the ST-3 return.
- The authorities remanded the matter to the original authority for reconciliation of issues and the impugned order is set aside and appeals are partially allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation