West Bengal AAR - Electricity charges recovered at actual cost, without any markup, can be treated as pure-agent recovery and excluded from the taxable value of maintenance services [Order attached]

DH Maintenance Limited, which provides maintenance and facility-management services for a commercial building, sought clarification on whether the recovery of electricity charges at actual cost, without any markup, could be considered as pure-agent reimbursement and thus excluded from the taxable value of their services. The company pays electricity charges to CESC and recovers these costs from individual unit holders, covering normal office, HVAC, and common-area consumption. They proposed a billing change to recover electricity charges at the same rate charged by CESC, without profit, separately from Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges.
The issue was whether this recovery qualifies as pure-agent reimbursement under Circular No. 206/18/2023-GST and Rule 33, thereby excluding it from the GST value of the maintenance services. The Authority noted that while electricity is typically part of a composite supply with maintenance as the principal supply, the circular provides an exception when electricity is recovered on an actual cost basis.
The Authority found that DH Maintenance Limited's proposed billing method, which recovers electricity costs based on sub-meter readings and apportions common-area electricity according to occupied area without any markup, qualifies as pure-agent recovery. Consequently, the electricity charge recovery would be excluded from the taxable value of the applicant's supply, and GST would not be applied to this portion.
Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
19-Sep-2026 11:09:42
DH Maintenance Limited, which provides maintenance and facility-management services for a commercial building, sought clarification on whether the recovery of electricity charges at actual cost, without any markup, could be considered as pure-agent reimbursement and thus excluded from the taxable value of their services. The company pays electricity charges to CESC and recovers these costs from individual unit holders, covering normal office, HVAC, and common-area consumption. They proposed a billing change to recover electricity charges at the same rate charged by CESC, without profit, separately from Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges.
The issue was whether this recovery qualifies as pure-agent reimbursement under Circular No. 206/18/2023-GST and Rule 33, thereby excluding it from the GST value of the maintenance services. The Authority noted that while electricity is typically part of a composite supply with maintenance as the principal supply, the circular provides an exception when electricity is recovered on an actual cost basis.
The Authority found that DH Maintenance Limited's proposed billing method, which recovers electricity costs based on sub-meter readings and apportions common-area electricity according to occupied area without any markup, qualifies as pure-agent recovery. Consequently, the electricity charge recovery would be excluded from the taxable value of the applicant's supply, and GST would not be applied to this portion.
Order Date - 01 September 2026
Facts -
- DH Maintenance Limited provides common-area maintenance and facility-management services for a commercial building and also pays electricity charges to CESC, which it recovers from individual unit holders.
- The electricity recovery covers normal office consumption, HVAC consumption and common-area consumption. Individual consumption is measured through sub-meters, while common-area electricity is proposed to be apportioned among occupants based on their respective super-built-up area.
- The company proposed changing its billing pattern so that electricity would be recovered at the same rate charged by CESC, without any markup or profit, with the electricity components separately identified along with Common Area Maintenance (CAM) charges.
- The applicant therefore sought a ruling on whether such recovery would qualify as pure-agent reimbursement under Circular No. 206/18/2023-GST and Rule 33, and whether GST would apply.
Issue -
- Whether recovery of electricity charges from occupants at actual cost, without markup, including HVAC and common-area electricity, qualifies as pure-agent recovery and is therefore outside the GST value of the applicant's maintenance supply.
Order -
- The Authority first noted that electricity supplied along with maintenance services ordinarily forms part of a composite supply, with maintenance being the principal supply and electricity an ancillary supply. Merely billing electricity separately does not, by itself, change this treatment.
- However, the Authority found that Circular No. 206/18/2023-GST creates a specific exception where electricity is recovered on an actual basis. Where the same amount charged by the DISCOM is recovered from occupants, the supplier is deemed to be acting as a pure agent for that electricity supply.
- The Authority observed that the applicant's proposed billing method would recover the same electricity cost charged by CESC, based on sub-meter readings for normal and HVAC consumption, with common-area electricity apportioned according to occupied area. No markup or profit would be added.
- Accordingly, the Authority ruled that the electricity recovery can be deemed to be made in the capacity of a pure agent, and the recovered electricity value would be excluded from the applicant's total value of supply. GST would not be levied on this excluded amount.
Related Post
- GST - Government has extended the last date for filing GSTAT...
- GSTN has mandated Ship-to GSTIN for applicable e-Invoice/e-W...
- GST News - GSTN has revised the AATO amendment window for FY...
- GST law committee clears proposal to protect buyers’ ITC w...
- GST News -GSTN mandates Ship-to GSTIN in e-Invoice and e-Way... View All
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation











