Top GST News, Case Laws & Circulars | Taxrealtime

Trending Now

Calcutta High Court - Narayana Hrudayalaya secured a stay on GST recovery for inpatient medicines, w... Orissa High Court - Due to interest demand wrongly classified as "Tax" in the Order, taxpayer cannot... Allahabad High Court - Demand order cannot confirm tax and penalty demand higher than what was propo... Uttarakhand High Court - Genuine typographical error in GST Invoice ["32" instead of "32/(2023-24)"]...

Top Stories

Customs – Cestat Mumbai: Valuation of imported goods – Even without considering that principle of natural justice was not adhered, absence of evidence to displace the declared value is enough to set aside the impugned or...

Customs – Cestat Ahmedabad: Refund of SAD is allowed even if the same is debited in any incentive scrip and not paid in cash.

Service Tax - Cestat Kolkata: Appeal filed within the condonable period of additional 30 days, appeal allowed and remanded back for adjudication, allowing reasonable opportunity of being heard.

Service Tax - Cestat New Delhi: Refund application filed through speed post was within the time limit; Also, Service tax deposited has changed the character of revenue deposit, no limitation is applicable on it – Directe...

GST – AAR Maharashtra: The Supply of PV DC Cables would be classified under Entry number 395 of Schedule III, having HSN 8544, liable to tax @ 18%.

GST – AAR Telangana: Royalty paid for mining to be classified under tariff item ‘997337’ ‘licensing services for the right to use minerals including its exploration and evaluation’, taxable @18%

Central Excise – Cestat New Delhi: No Cenvat reversal required on selling of electricity generated out of waste – Impugned Order set aside.

GST – Calcutta High Court: Order to show cause notice was passed before the time limit to submit the reply, hence not sustainable. Directed to treat Order as show cause notice and file the reply.

Custom: High Court Delhi: Seeking provisional release of goods – Having no objection of Revenue, Petitioner is allowed to furnish differential bank guarantee in terms of Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962.

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad- As refund of deposit was sanctioned within three months from the date of application - Not entitled for interest.

GST – Karnataka High Court: The Petitioner can’t be forced to pay 100% of the penalty, if the requirement in law is that to deposit only 25% of the penalty in terms of Section 107 of the CGST Act.

GST: Karnataka Commercial Taxes Department has issued Circular GST No. 01/2022-23 regarding introduction of electronic module for revocation of cancelled GSTIN beyond 90 days by LGSTO’S/SGSTO’S based on Appeal order / Hi...

‹ Previous Page Next Page ›

News Updates

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442