Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws, CENVAT Rulings & Updates | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending

GST – Allahabad High Court holds taxable event of works contract is its execution, which is in pre-G... GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation of goods and vehicle is illegal merely for violation of Sec... GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Rule 86A(3) provides restriction to block credit ledger automatic... GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation under Section 130 invalid in case of excess stock found; Pr...

Excise / VAT / CST

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: There is no condition that the brand which has been advertised should have been owned by the assessee availing CENVAT credit, hence CENVAT on advertising services are rightly availed – Appeal...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Commissioner (Appeals) has indeed power to remand the matter as held by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Mil India Limited vs. CCE, Noida- 2007 (210) ELT 188 (SC) - Revenue appeal dismissed...

Excise – CESTAT Ahmedabad : Appellant has correctly discharged the duty on the transaction value as the goods after using for 4 years are cleared as waste or scrap, no requirement of reversal of Cenvat credit – Appeal al...

Excise – CESTAT Ahmedabad: It is settled that after reversal of credit in respect of input, input in process and input contained in final products whatever balance is left shall lapse only when the Notification is uncon...

Excise – CESTAT Ahmedabad: As the accident which caused the loss of the excisable goods to the appellant was unavoidable, hence remission of duty on goods lost in fire accident is allowed – Appeal allowed [Order attached...

Excise – CESTAT New Delhi: Appellant is entitled to Cenvat credit on account of Education Cess and SHE Cess by debiting the DEPB scrips towards the payment of central excise duty – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Excise – CESTAT Ahmedabad: Freight and handling charges separately indicated in invoices cannot be included in assessable value – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Cenvat credit availed prior to commencement of production on input services relating to setting up of unit cannot be denied - Classification of service cannot be disturbed or challenged at the...

Excise – Calcutta High Court: Issue of difference between installed production as declared in the ER-7 statement and the ER-1 return – Held that as department has not been able to establish the charge of clandestine remo...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Penalty is not payable by the employee Director of the Company as he neither availed Cenvat credit nor is the beneficiary of Cenvat credit – Appeal allowed [Order attached]

Excise - Cestat Ahmedabad – As the Appellant M/s. Himalaya Equipments and M/s. Himalaya Engineers & Manufacturers, though have different names but owned by same partners therefore their value will be clubbed for computat...

Excise – Cestat New Delhi: Once the appellant SEZ unit is found to be eligible to claim the refund, the substantive conditions are complied with and the condition of time limit for making the claim being only a procedura...

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442