Excise, VAT & CST Case Laws, CENVAT Rulings & Updates | Taxrealtime

TAX REAL TIME

QUICK TAX SOLUTIONS

Register Sign in |

Trending

GST – Allahabad High Court holds taxable event of works contract is its execution, which is in pre-G... GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation of goods and vehicle is illegal merely for violation of Sec... GST – Punjab & Haryana High Court: Rule 86A(3) provides restriction to block credit ledger automatic... GST – Allahabad High Court: Confiscation under Section 130 invalid in case of excess stock found; Pr...

Excise / VAT / CST

Excise – Tripura High Court: Issue of refund sanctioned on education cess and higher education cess collected - As the ground raised by the review petitioner is not satisfactory, the prayer made in review petition stands...

Excise – Supreme Court: Sale of footwear to defense/paramilitary is not a retail sale as per the Act, there exists no mandate of law herein to affix an MRP on the goods sold, and hence the said impugned transaction canno...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad – Appellant is entitled for CENVAT credit in respect of Cement, MS angles, Channels, Beams, Bars, etc. used for foundation of plant and machinery in his factory basis the Charted Engineer’s Cert...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Post issuance of SCN, the Appellant is allowed to make the delayed payment of duty by utilizing CENVAT credit and is not required to pay in cash - The matter is no longer a res-integra – Appeal...

Excise: Cestat Mumbai - The goods, in issue, even though it is used outside the factory, since it is used in or in relation to the manufacture of final product, the credit is admissible; Availment of Cenvat credit has be...

Excise – Cestat Mumbai: Notifications enhancing the rate of duty would be effective from the date and time of its publication in its Official Gazette and not from the date of its issue - Uploading in the website of the C...

Excise – Cestat Chennai: Appellants are eligible to get the concessional rate of duty as per the Notification in regard to finished goods since it is a case of de-bonding and not DTA sale - Refund of excess duty paid on...

Excise – Cestat Chennai: In case inter-unit transfer the actual cost of production (100% of the cost of production), of the raw material procured from one unit [excluding the notional loading under Rule 8 – 15% / 10%] is...

Excise – Cestat Ahmedabad: Buyer’s premises cannot, in law, be a “place of removal” - Merely because the appellant is under obligation to deliver the goods at the buyer’s premises, the place of removal which is a factory...

Excise – Cestat Kolkata: Iron and steel, cement, welding electrodes etc. used in the factory in the manufacture of storage tank and also for pollution control system are Inputs and are eligible for CENVAT credit – Appeal...

Karnataka VAT – Supreme Court of India: Mere production of the invoices or the payment made by cheques is not enough and cannot be said to be discharging the burden of proof - In the absence of cogent material like furni...

Excise – Cestat Chennai: There is consensus ad idem to transfer the ownership along with assets and liabilities to the lessee unit - Thus, the rejection of the request to transfer Cenvat credit balance to the newly trans...

‹ Previous Page

News Updates

Get complete access to news updates - @299 + GST for 6 months / @499 + GST for 1 Year

Get in Touch

info@taxrealtime.in

+91 7291044154

+91 7849813442