GST – Allahabad High Court: Final demand exceeding SCN is invalid; taxpayer's silence doesn’t justify bypassing statutory safeguards – Petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
24-Jun-2025 18:36:41
Order Date – 07 May 2025
Parties: M/s Vibhuti Tyres Vs State of U.P. and Another
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Vibhuti Tyres, was issued a show-cause notice dated 29.09.2023 imposing tax, penalty and interest. However the petitioner fails to response to the said show-cause notice. As no appearance was made, the same led to passing of the order dated 18.11.2023 raising the demand.
- The petitioner submitted that raising demand is contrary to the show-cause notice issued to the petitioner and in violation of Section 75(7) of the Act.
Issue –
- Whether the final order passed under Section 73 can demand an amount higher than what was specified in the SCN?
Order –
- The Divisional Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that Section 75 deals with general provisions relating to determination of tax and sub-section (7) specifically stipulates that the amount of tax, interest and penalty demanded in the order shall not be in excess of the amount specified in the notice and no demand shall be confirmed on the grounds other than the grounds specified in the notice.
- Admittedly, in the present case, the show-cause notice merely indicates the amount of Rs. 8,81,080/- as representing the tax, interest and penalty and the demand qua the three components has been raised at Rs. 32,97,336/-, which is ex facie contrary to the provisions of Section 75(7) of the Act.
- In view of the above discussion, on account of violation of provisions of Section 75(7) of the Act, the order impugned cannot be sustained. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation