GST – Allahabad High Court: It is incumbent to grant an opportunity of personal hearing even if the same is not asked for as per Section 75(4) – Writ petition allowed [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
20-Jun-2025 22:28:13
Order Date – 06 May 2025
Parties: M/s Amar Agencies vs. State of U.P. & 3 Others
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s Amar Agencies, was served with a show cause notice to which they responded with a request for personal hearing.
- However, the adjudicating authority passed the order without granting personal hearing, violating Section 75(4) of the GST Act.
- The petitioner appealed the decision. The appellate authority noted the counsel’s initial appearances but later absence, and dismissed the appeal for lack of evidence without discussing it on merits.
Issue –
- Whether the order passed under Section 73 without granting personal hearing, despite a specific request, is valid?
Order –
- The Hon’ble High Court observed that In terms of the mandate of Section 75(4) of GST Act, it is incumbent to grant an opportunity of hearing even if the same is not asked for, as such, the order under Section 73 of GST Act is in violation of principles of natural justice as well as against the mandate of Section 75(4) of GST Act.
- The appellate order, although, records the submission made in the memo of appeal, however, does not deal the same on merits and record that the appellant has failed to adduce any evidence. The said manner of adjudication cannot be termed as justified in view of the mandate of Section 107(12) of GST Act.
- Thus, finding the impugned orders dated 28.12.2023 & 23.12.2024 to be short of requirements of the mandatory provisions, the same cannot be sustained and are quashed.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation