GST – Madras High Court: Delay condoned of 285 days in filing the appeal against the summary order, being assessee unaware of the Order [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
26-Jun-2025 13:50:22
Order Date – 03 June 2025
Parties: M/s. Hitech CNC Engineering Vs Deputy Commissioner (Commercial Tax) (FAC), Goods and Services Tax Appeal, Salem & The Commercial Tax Officer, Hosur
Facts –
- The Petitioner, M/s. Hitech CNC Engineering, filed an appeal against ex parte summary assessment order dated 25.07.2023 with a delay of 285 days, beyond the statutory condonable period.
- Petitioner prayed to condone the delay in filing the appeal on any terms including any condition of additional pre-deposit as they remained unaware of the said order and hence, they were unable to file the appeal within time.
Issue –
- Whether the delay of 285 days in filing the appeal could be condoned?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that the reason assigned by the petitioner, for the delay in filing the appeal against the summary order, appears to be genuine. In such view of the matter, this Court is inclined to condone the delay, in filing the appeal against the impugned summary order, on terms.
- Therefore, though the petitioner had already paid 10% of the disputed tax amount as pre-deposit while filing the appeal, considering the delay of 30 days, the Court directed the petitioner to pay additional 5% of the disputed tax amount, as agreed by the petitioner, to the respondents.
- The writ petition is disposed of.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation