GST – Madras High Court: Service of notice through portal alone may be insufficient if not effectively received, alternate statutory modes preferably by way of RPAD should be used [Order attached]

Your free trial / membership plan is expired.
Kindly subscribe to get complete access to indirect tax updates and issue wise cases
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates and download copy of case laws/ notification/ circular etc.
Be a part of our WhatsApp group and read real time indirect tax updates
Access to ready case laws of General Issues and Industry Wide Issues under GST
Access to relevant provisions of law / circular in respect to the issues, along with trail of their amendments
Write your GST query to us for evaluation
Subscription Charges:*
Indirect tax updates -
6 months @299 / 1 Year @499 only
Indirect tax updates + Issue wise cases -
6 months @1199 / 1 Year @1999 only
*Plus applicable GST
Admin
26-Jun-2025 13:52:19
Order Date – 02 June 2025
Parties: TVL. Dee Dee Creations Vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2, Tiruppur (North)-1 Assessment Circle
Facts –
- The Petitioner, TVL. Dee Dee Creations, submit that a show cause notice and all other allied communications were uploaded on ''View Additional notices/orders'', which was unnoticed by the petitioner and hence, the petitioner failed to file reply to such show cause notice and appear before the respondent.
- Without even affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, passed the impugned order confirming the proposals contained in the show cause notice, which even was unknown to the petitioner and only when the bank account of the petitioner came to be attached.
Issue –
- Whether an assessment order passed solely on online portal notice, without alternative service or personal hearing, violates principles of natural justice?
Order –
- The Single Bench of Hon’ble High Court observed that sending notice by uploading in portal is a sufficient service, but, the Officer who finds no response from the petitioner to the show cause notices, instead of sending repeated reminders, should have applied his/her mind and explored the possibility of sending notices by way of other modes prescribed in Section 169 of the GST Act, which are also the valid mode of service under the Act, otherwise, the service of notice will not be deemed to be an effective service, rather, it would only fulfilling the empty formalities.
- Thus, when there is no response from the tax payer to the notice sent through a particular mode, the Officer who is issuing notices should strictly explore the possibilities of sending notices through some other mode as prescribed in Section 169(1) of the Act, preferably by way of RPAD, which would ultimately achieve the object of the GST Act.
- Therefore, the Court inclined to set aside the impugned order, as the same suffers from the violation of principles of natural justice.
Related Post
Post Category
Your free trial/ membership plan has expired. Kindly subscribe to get complete access of tax news updates.
Why subscribe to us ?
Get complete access to news updates
Access to the Order Copy of the case law/ Notification/ Circular etc
Be a part of our Whatsapp group and read real time tax updates
Access to ready case laws/ circulars on general and industry-wide issues under GST
Submit your GST issues to us for evaluation